![]() The Qi wireless charging is something else that the author has overlooked. What do you think of Lockheimer’s Qi charging arguments? Are you disappointed at the lack of wireless charging in the new Nexus devices? Let us know in the comments. It might be gone for this round of Nexus phones, but it will be back. Google is nothing if not a future-oriented tech company and I don’t for a second believe it is abandoning wireless charging because USB-Type C connectors are reversible, or because it makes devices too thick. In the recent technology history, wireless connectivity has been a major goal. My problem is the patronizing excuse from Lockheimer. (Though Google might find it hard to believe, I can work out the complex plug-in charging system that smartphones currently employ.) My problem is not that Qi charging has been left off the new Nexus phones – honestly, it's a luxury I’d rather not have to pay for. I don’t see the need to spend an additional 50 bucks on a gadget to place between the wall outlet and my smartphone for the convenience of not having to plug it in either. There will have been other reasons behind the decision to omit wireless charging, but it usually comes down to time or money or both – which would actually have been perfectly acceptable reasons. What is the real reason behind the absence of Qi?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |